One velocity figure to another or three or 10 is enough that erwinindigne1is looking to see and hear change, character, volume, whatever. No need to examine a crescendo between the two points. It could be VCO's, LFO's, envelopes, filter cutoffs, etc. How is it, essential plays a roll? Sampled layers may not be the only change occuring. It could be essential on a host of changes off of velocity. Do velocity 68 and 67 sound different then? Yes.īut does it sound that different that it is essential for the crescendo/decrescendo whether it starts or ends at 68 or 67? That was my point."
Veloline 2do Patch#
In a synth patch it might be routed to filter cutoff. Jazzundso wrote: "Otherwise? Velocity is probably routed to volume. 67-68, 27-58, either could be a swell of a multitude of change with different parameters. There's no need for expressing the difference of today's sampler/synths over those hardware oldies. So as long as a velocity of 67 to 68 contains some change, then the condition or request to see such change is valid. I see erwinindigne1 answered some points further about his usage from each velocity step, but my take on the whole usage of one velocity note to another in one step intervals is purely change does in fact occur in an older hardware synth (lets say late 80's) no matter if it's multi sampled, filtered, enveloped, pitched, oscillated, etc. "Īnd possibly not.we don't know even how subtle the layered samples might be. Will they sound different? If it's a multisample with multiple velocity layers and a new layer starts at velocity 68 -> then definitely. Jazzundso wrote: "Take any patch in your Ensoniq or EMU modules and play a note at velocity 67. In which you stated "'Really? Which old hardware synth/sampler is that responsive in terms of velocity?"Īt least on my behalf, I'm not questioning the resolution of sampler/synths or modelling now used, of which we all know is much higher. My point was strictly to your response to erwinindigne1 I also recorded a little too hot being over excited with a new guitar purchase. My bad because it's the only song giving me trouble. I think due to a little too much shuffling of tracks in unorthodox ways, and also some unexplained audio aliasing. I had a huge snag with a song crashing in Studio One.
Hi jazzundso, Sorry for the delayed response. I'm sort of surprised at your question, but I could be missing something.
They all were not grouped to some lesser resolution output, and I could meter and see those differences always. That would be: (samplers shown only)Įnsoniq Mirage, (original version I still own. As to old hardware, every synth or sampler I've ever owned read and outputed the same 128 velocity.
Since the inception of MIDI, 128 (0-127) has been the velocity value allotted.
Veloline 2do full#
Jazzundso wrote erwinindigne1 wroteIt might be a use full addition to this great daw (Yeah, I do love S1 more then Cubase) / and probably it will not disturb any one that doesn't need it?Agreed!Įrwinindigne1 wroteI rely a lot on exact midi values as the 128 divisions can make a difference for a (old hardware) synth to behave / sound different in just 1 midi value difference.Really? Which old hardware synth/sampler is that responsive in terms of velocity?Ģnd (if I may).
0 kommentar(er)
